Get Out the Vote, Matey

Pirate Party Logo

2009 was the year of the pirate.  While Somali pirates were raiding Africa’s sea lanes (and American  news outlets, for that matter) another group of pirates was carrying out a quieter assault on European politics.

In June of last year, Sweden’s Pirate Party captured one of their country’s 18 seats¹ in the European Parliament.  The party has, since its formation in 2006, been leading a quiet revolution in politics.  The party ran in Sweden’s national elections the year it was formed and polled 0.63% of the vote.  From this humble beginning, the party has gained in popularity in Sweden, where it was able to loot 7.1% of the nation’s votes in the latest election.  Although their membership has since dwindled, at its peak, the Pirate Party boasted 50,000 members.
Internationally, the party has also fared well.  It has spawned more than 40 sister parties.  They have spread not only through Europe and Asia, but have also sailed across the Atlantic to find footholds in North and South America.

What accounts for this rapid spread of political piracy is more than the party’s amusing name.  The party’s platform consists of only three planks.  Sweden’s pirates advocate less restrictive copyright laws, the abolition of patents, particularly medical patents, and the protection of personal privacy.  These are the sort of planks many voters are willing to walk, particularly younger voters who make up the bulk of the party’s membership.

The Swedish Pirate Party hopes to transform its victory in the European election into a victory in Sweden’s national election later this year.  As long as it can stave off the competing Viking Party and prevent the foundation of a potentially ruinous Ninja Party, Sweden’s pirates may be able to plunder their way into parliament.

1.  For the sake of simplicity I say 1 seat of 18.  In reality, it appears the Pirate Party captured 2 seats of 20.  The problem is Sweden has two non-voting seats on the European parliament, one of which now belongs to the Pirate Party.  Effectively this means Sweden only has 18 real seats in Europe’s parliament and therefor the Pirate Party only won one real seat.  See why I left this out of the article proper?

More on Pirates:

http://www.thepirateparty.com/index.php/policy-overview

http://www.pp-international.net/

http://af.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idAFTRE55623320090607

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/jun/08/elections-pirate-party-sweden

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/02/rick-falkvinge-is-the-face.ars

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/20/pirate_bay_trial_one_year_on/

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,613820,00.html

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,631403,00.html

http://torrentfreak.com/the-swedish-pirate-party-presents-their-election-manifesto/

Leave a Comment

Filed under Pernicious Politics

Phthisical Extremities

Most English speakers prefer to represent the sound /t/ with the letter t.  Occasionally, though, there comes along the masochistic sort who prefers to spell it phth. Such is the case with the oddball word phthisic,¹ which means roughly “lung disease” and can refer to tuberculosis, asthma, or bronchitis among other diseases.

I first came across phthisic in a lecture series by Seth Lerer, where he characterized it as an unusual bit of Maine dialect.  While it probably lasted in actual use longer in Maine than anywhere else, phthisic and its cousin phthisis predate English settlement of Maine by a few centuries.

The Oxford English Dictionary’s first citation of the word, spelled tisik, dates from 1301.  Over the years, phthisic went through quite a few contorted spellings in the hands of numerous authors.  It danced from pthisic to tphisike, from tissick to tysyc, from ptysic to tisyk, and just about every other imaginable spelling.  When its spelling finally became standardized, people eschewed more intuitive spellings like tissic in favor of the freakishly obtuse phthisic.

How we got to the strange spelling can be seen in the word’s etymology.  The Online Etymology Dictionary traces the word’s history back from English into Old French as tisike to the Vulgar Latin word phthisis which, when traced back through identical words in Latin and Greek, has its origin in the Greek word phthinein (φθινειν), meaning “to waste away.”²  Somewhere along the line, as was the case with words like doubt, which comes from the Old French douter, a more archaic spelling was substituted for the more intuitive one to give phthisic a more official appearance.  This ridiculous change has survived, much to the chagrin of spelling bee contestants, into present times.

Fortunately for the average speller, phthisic now exists largely as a historical artifact, unlikely to rear its head outside the confines of more challenging spelling bees.

1.  It is also the case for the even more amazing word phthongometer, which was an instrument for measuring the intensty of vowel sounds.

2.  This etymology is essentially the same as that in the Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology except that the ODEE has tisik in Middle English entering from the Old French word tisike or tisique and it spells phthínein with an accent over the first iKlein’s Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language lists the Old French as only tisique, which descended from an older French form phthisique, which comes from the Latin phthisica.  While the different etymologies differ on minor details, they all show that phthisic had lost the phth before entering English and regained the spelling as a later addition.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Loquacious Language

Publi City

The City of Google

Some people will do anything to get attention or money and, it turns out, so will some places.  One of those places is Topeka, Kansas.  Topeka caused quite a stir when the city’s mayor, Bill Bunten, declared in an official proclamation that the city would be known as Google through the month of March, in a bid to get internet giant Google to install a high-speed fiberoptic cable network in the city.¹ In a reciprocal gesture, Google, for April Fool’s Day rechristened itself “Topeka.”

This wasn’t Topeka’s first foray into the world of shameless marketing.  Back in 1998, when Pokemon was poised to take America by storm, Topeka redubbed itself “Topikachu” when it hosted the official launch of the Japanese franchise in America.

Of course, Topeka isn’t the only city to ever rename itself for a quick buck and a little attention.  In 2000, Halfway, Oregon, a town of under 400 people, renamed itself Half.com for a year in exchange for some computers and a ton of cash.

The granddaddy of all sellout cities, however, is Hot Springs, New Mexico.  Better known by its present day name of Truth or Consequences, Hot Springs changed its name when Ralph Edwards, the host of the popular radio game show Truth or Consequences, offered to broadcast the show from the first town that would change its name to the name of his show.  Edwards kept his word, hosting his show live from Truth or Consequences on April 1, 1950.  Edwards would return for the next fifty years to celebrate with the townspeople in the annual Truth or Consequences Fiesta.  Since his death in 2005, Truth or Consequences has celebrated Edwards with Ralph Edwards Day every April 1.

Unfortunately, being willing to do anything for a little money or attention also has a dark side.  West Virginia for a few years boasted of its willingness to be pillaged for profit with the official slogan “Open for Business.”²  And it was true.  The West Virginia landscape is dotted with smoke-belching factories.  It also plays host to the socially and environmentally devastating practice of Mountain Top Removal, where coal mining companies literally blow off the tops of mountains with explosives.  West Virginia has since changed its slogan to “Wild and Wonderful,” but should it maintain its current economic practices, there won’t be much left that could be called either “wild” or “wonderful” about the state.

West Virginia Slogan


1.  Of course, this name change isn’t actually a legal renaming.  Actually renaming a state capital, changing all its signage and letterheads, etc, and then changing it all back after a month would be a legal and financial nightmare.

2.  One West Virginian was quoted at Adfreak.com as saying, “[The slogan] sounds like an invitation to anyone and everyone to come right in and start raping the land that we have left for strip malls, movie theaters, Starbucks, sex shops and every other business that marks the downfall and overdevelopment of an area.”

2 Comments

Filed under Gelatinous Geography, Pertinent People

Penny for the Guy?

Fawkes_Political_Poster

“Remember, remember the fifth of November,
Gunpowder treason and plot.
We see no reason
Why gunpowder treason
Should ever be forgot!”

Some holidays involve wholesome activities like picnics, feasts, or an exchange of gifts, others, like the English holiday Guy Fawkes Day (aka Bonfire Night) call for more exciting activities, namely effigy burning.

The first I ever heard of Guy Fawkes Day was while watching the “Depth Takes a Holiday” episode of Daria, so my impression of the holiday mostly concerned the word “bollocks.” Turns out, there’s a bit more to it than that. This holiday is no mere bit of American fascination with English vernacular for “testicles,” but is instead a commemoration of Britain’s turbulent and often rather nasty past.

Every November 5th for the last 400-odd years Brits gather around bonfires, watch fireworks, and burn effigies of the holiday’s namesake. Traditionally, children often paraded through towns with these effigies during the day, begging from those they met, “Penny for the Guy?” so they could scrounge up the money to buy fireworks. This practice has mostly died off in recent years as someone in the UK finally decided that selling fireworks to vagrant, panhandling minors ought to be illegal.

But where does such a holiday come from? Its roots go back to 1534 when Henry VIII, in rather cavalier fashion, split the Church of England from the Catholic Church so he could leave his wife and marry Anne Boleyn (but not that other Boleyn girl.)¹ This lead to a pretty high level of tensions between the numerous Brits loyal to the Catholic church and English Protestants.

In 1553, Mary I (aka Bloody Mary) reestablished Roman Catholicism as the official church in England and made a nasty habit of burning resistant Protestants to death. In 1559, after Mary I’s death, Elizabeth I once again made the Church of England separate from papal authority.

In response to Catholic resistance to her rule Elizabeth I eventually passed a number of anti-Catholic laws. These laws, combined with anti-Catholic sentiment stemming from the memory of “Bloody” Mary and Spain’s attempted invasion of England in 1588, lead to a prolonged period of harsh and sometimes deadly persecution of English Catholics.

By 1605, things hadn’t gotten any less tense. James I had succeeded Elizabeth in 1603 but did not let up on the persecution of Catholics. The Catholics, in turn, had not yet given up their resistance. A group of conspirators, so the accepted story goes, decided to murder James I and the members of Parliament by setting off a massive explosion of gunpowder on the day Parliament opened, November 5th.

Notified of the conspiracy by a letter of warning to one of the members of Parliament to stay home sick on the 5th, Guy Fawkes was caught in the basement of Parliament seconds away from lighting an obscene amount of gunpowder he and his coconspirators had stored in a room they had rented.² After being tortured, Guy revealed the names of those he worked with. A few were killed during a siege of their hideout, while the rest were rounded up, tortured, and (except for one lucky fellow who died in prison) were hanged, drawn and quartered.³

Of course, there is a second story that the conspirators were largely framed in order to justify continued persecution of Catholics. Even in 1605 its hard to imagine no one would have noticed a bunch of men, some probably known Catholics, just sauntering down into the basement of Parliament with barrel upon barrel of gunpowder.

Today, the Gunpowder Plot, as Guy’s conspiracy became known, and Guy Fawkes himself are remembered in a number of ways beyond the traditional celebrations. The most notable of these is the movie V for Vendetta based on Alan Moore’s dystopian comic-book series of the same name . He is also a powerful political symbol used both by anarchists and by conservative pundits.

1. Had it not been for Henry VIII’s infamous libido, there may never have been a Guy Fawkes Day.

2. Perhaps this is why governments no longer routinely rent out their important buildings to just anyone.

3. “Drawn and quartered” is the polite way of saying “had their guts ripped out and their bodies hacked into four pieces.”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Cantankerous Culture, Historical Hullabaloo, Hopped-Up Holidays, Righteous Religion

When Galaxies Collide

Considering how long it’s been since my last post, I felt that this entry needed to be truly stellar. The trouble was, in doing research, much of the most interesting material I came across regarding stars seemed to be made up.¹ That wouldn’t do. Then, with expectations flagging, I found it: galactic collisions. Galactic collisions make for beautiful pictures and take place on a massive, galaxy-shattering scale that can only be described by words like “epic,” “monumental,” and “holy shit!”² They also take an interesting variety of forms. Some galaxies dance peacefully together, ever so slightly avoiding actual collision. Others merge like lovers, taking all the metaphor out of the phrase “when two become one.” For other galaxies, their collisions are more akin to hit-and-run accidents, or even cannibalism.

The Whirlpool galaxy and NGC 5195
The Whirlpool galaxy and its companion NGC 5195 are a wonderful example of cosmic dance. The little NGC 5195 has been passing alongside the Whirlpool galaxy for millions of years. The gravitational interaction of these two partners has likely had great effect on both, sharpening the larger’s two distinct spiral arms and contributing to the smaller’s own amorphous form.

antennae2
More intimately, the Antennae galaxies have forgone mere dancing, to merge together in blissful, if fiery, harmony. Once, they were two independent spiral galaxies, but hundreds of millions of years of courtship has brought them together so that they are barely distinguishable from one another. A few hundred million years more may find them merged completely, but give them time; in cosmic terms, they’re a young couple yet.

mice
Another young couple is the Mice galaxies. While they are expected to merge like the Antennae, the Mice are still in the less intense phase of their merge, still dancing around one another, interacting, but still relatively distinct, flirting with the idea of union.

Cartwheel galaxyIn stark contrast to these lover galaxies is the Cartwheel galaxy, who looks like a hit-and-run victim. The Cartwheel’s distinctive ripple-in-a-pond look is the result of a nasty head-on collision with a smaller galaxy, which then continued on its merry way, leaving the Cartwheel galaxy to sort itself out alone.

Andromeda galaxyOn the flip side of the smaller galaxy’s David-versus-Goliath drubbing of the Cartwheel, is galactic cannibalism, which occurs when large galaxies devour their smaller companions whole or in part. This can be seen in the nearby Andromeda galaxy which has stripped stars from its satellites M32 and NGC 205. It even appears to be syphoning off stars from the Triangulum galaxy, from a distance of a million light-years.

The same can be seen in our own Milky Way galaxy, which has numerous star streams and clusters that could be the remnants of dwarf galaxies slowly being digested.

The cannibalism of Andromeda and the Milky Way may serve as a common interest when the two galaxies meet, as they are expected to, in a few billion years. Perhaps they will slam together merging themselves like the Antennae, or perhaps they will dance around each other for a time, merging slowly and cautiously like the Mice galaxies. One thing we can know for sure: it will be a love affair of astronomical proportions.


1. Many of the interesting and bizarre types of stars and stellar phenomenon, like fuzzballs* and Quark stars* are purely hypothetical, or in rare instances theoretically confirmed only by the scantiest of evidence. My favorite is the preon star, a hypothetical star made up of a hypothetical type of particle known as preons. Seems like someone would confirm the preon’s existence before pretending things can be made out of it.

2. Yes, I know “holy shit” is a phrase, not a word.

More Information/Sources:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/13/the-beauty-of-cosmic-collisions/
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/galaxies/colliding.html

The Whirlpool:
http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/html/heic0506a.html
http://usproxy.bbc.com/2/hi/science/nature/1263664.stm
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap090526.html

The Antennae:
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1086.html
http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/html/heic0615.html
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=25413

The Mice:
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2002/11/image/d
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/M/Mice.html

The Cartwheel:
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1995/02/
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap010612.html
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/galaxies/Cartwheel.html
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Cartwheel_Galaxy_Makes_Waves_In_New_NASA_Image.html

Cannibalism, Andromeda, and Milky Way:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/andromeda_010705.html
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17728-milky-ways-twin-caught-dismembering-neighbour.html
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14549-eleven-new-streams-of-stars-found-in-milky-way.html
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Sloan_Survey_Identifies_New_Dwarf_Galaxy_Inside_Milky_Way.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jan/05/galaxy-collision-space-milky-way

1 Comment

Filed under Awesome Astronomy, Scintillating Science

Let’s Get Quisical

While “Benedict Arnold” remains in use in American parlance as a way of referring to a traitor, the much more noxious sounding quisling has largely fallen by the wayside. An unfortunate fate for a word that has been described by the London Times as “a gift from the gods…something at once slippery and tortuous.” Like Benedict Arnold, quisling originates from a historical figure, in this case Vidkun Abraham Lauritz Jonssøn Quisling.

Quisling the man was born in 1887 in Norway. As a child, he was something of a mathematical prodigy. As an adult, he achieved the rank of major in Norway’s army. He worked frequently in Russia aiding in relief work during the famine of 1921 and protecting British interests in the fledgeling Soviet Union.

His time amongst Russians led to two amorous encounters and the first hint of his traitorous leanings. In 1922, he married a seventeen-year-old Ukrainian before replacing her the next year with his second wife a Russian woman named Maria.

He served as Norway’s minister of defense from 1931 to 1933, where he used military force to quell a strike. He then went on to form Norway’s Nasjonal Samling Party, which propounded fascist ideology and met with little popular support. In 1939, he began courting a Nazi invasion, which took place in April, 1940. He quickly declared himself head of the Norwegian government. In 1945, after facing years of popular resistance and resentment, Quisling was executed as a traitor.

Quisling, the word, was born in 1940 in England. the April 15th edition of the London Times first put it into print. A month later Time printed the word for the first time as lowercase. Much more popular than its namesake, it was used during World War II by such figures as Winston Churchill, George Orwell, and H. G. Wells. It would go one to spawn the the verb to quisle, quislingism, quislingize, and other rarely used words, which have all gone the way of old Vidkun himself.

More about Quisling:
The Merriam-Webster New Book of Word Histories.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Quisling.html
http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/24/malarkey/
http://www.bitsofnews.com/content/view/3965/42/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidkun_Quisling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quisling

Leave a Comment

Filed under Historical Hullabaloo, Loquacious Language, Pertinent People, Volatile Vocabulary

Cake or Defenestration?

Some words just capture people’s fancy. They amuse the mind and tickle the tongue. This was never more true than during my time in junior high. As my classmates and I entered this new academic world from elementary school we found that there was indeed a vocabulary beyond the “yo mama” jokes that captivated us only a year before. Along with the awfully unwieldy antidisestablishmentarianism,¹ the word that most dazzled our malleable minds was defenestration.

Few words roll of the tongue quite the way defenestration does. (Go ahead; try it. You know you want to, if there’s any joy left in your heart.) The fact that this word means “the action of throwing someone or something out of a window” makes it all the more delightful. Defenestration stands head and shoulders above other words for acts of violence.² Murder, punching, kicking, beating: boring. Defenestration has the added advantage of confusing an opponent. By the time they figure out what “I will defenestrate you!” means, they’re already flying through the nearest window.

But where does such a word come from? The boring answer is Latin. Defenestration can be broken down into de meaning off or from and fenestra meaning (and this should be pretty obvious) window.

The longer, and imminently more interesting story is that, according to the Online Etymology Dictionary, it was coined in 1620 to describe an event that occurred two years prior, the Defenestration of Prague.³

The early 1600s were a time of religious unease. The Protestant Reformation had been running amok in Europe for about a century. Bohemia, the area around Prague, had been been home to its own religious reform movement since the early 1400s. While Bohemia boasted a streak of religious independence, it lacked political independence. Since 1526, Bohemia had been part of the Habsburg Empire, which ruled much of central Europe. The ruling family, the Habsburgs, were Roman Catholic, which caused some amount of worry among Protestant Bohemians. In 1609, in a document known as the Letter of Majesty, Emperor Rudolph II guaranteed religious freedom. His gesture would only briefly quell tension in Bohemia. Five years after Rudolph II’s death, Roman Catholic officials halted the construction of two Protestant chapels in 1617. This turned out to be a terrible idea.

Enraged Protestants tried two imperial regents, William Slavata and Jaroslav Martinic, for violating the Letter of Majesty. Finding them guilty, they tossed the two men (and, for good measure, their secretary) out of a window of the Prague Castle on May 23, 1618. Miraculously, the three defenestratees sustained no serious injury due to landing in a moat full of manure (or at least a pile of manure in a moat.)

This act of defenestration was no small to-do. It sparked a rebellion in Bohemia which boiled over into surrounding areas. By the time this rebellion was crushed in 1621, the war was beginning to spread, having already embroiled Spain and to a lesser extent to Ottoman Empire. It would continue to spread, involving most of Europe and becoming known to history as the Thirty Years War. (Thirty years, coincidentally, is how long it lasted.)

While the war should have ended with the defeat of the rebels, the Bohemians did not know the word quit. The remnants of the rebellious forces under their leader Frederick V, the Winter King, continued to battle Spanish forces in Frederick’s German territories. Although defeated by 1623, Frederick’s continued fight made clear the power of Spain and the Habsburg Empire to the rest of Europe. Now the French, English, Dutch, would unite to convince Christian IV of Denmark to fight against the two powers while they watched. In 1630, after watching the Danish forces get thoroughly trounced, Sweden’s king Gustavus Adolphus decided to step in.

Sweden, subsidized by France, did well for a time. They conquered numerous German territories and seemed to have the Habsburgs on the run until Gustavus Adolphus died in battle in 1632. After that their efforts faltered. By 1634, Sweden’s army was on the ropes and ready to say uncle.

After meddling for almost entire conflict, France finally entered the war in ernest. From this point on France and Sweden were largely successful on the battlefield while Spain and the Habsburg Empire were less so. On October 24, 1648, the Peace of Westphalia was declared, ending the Thirty Years War in what basically amounted to a draw. The only real losers would be the German people who, being caught between the Habsburgs and everyone who hated them, lost a devastating 20% of their population, roughly 7,000,000 people.


1. Contrary to my prior belief, antidisestablishmentarianism wasn’t just a word coined to be stupidly long (although those do exist.) It has its roots in British religiopolitical debate. The term was first used in 1838. The Church of England at the time was “established” in England, Wales, and Ireland, meaning it was the official state church. Those who opposed the union of church and state were disestablishmentarians. Those who opposed them were, rather redundantly, known as antidisestablishmentarians (they could have just as easily, and much less awkwardly, been called establishmentarians.) While the Church of England was disestablished in Ireland and Wales, the debate is is still all the rage in England, as demonstrated by this amusing article from The Times.

If you feel like wasting about one second of your day, you can always visit antidisestablishmentarianism.com.

2. Except for fisticuffs. Fisticuffs is awesome.

3. This was actually the Second Defenestration of Prague. The lesser known First Defenestration of Prague took place on July 30, 1419, when an angry crowd of religious dissidents threw seven town councillors to their deaths from the windows the New Town Hall.

You can view Lego recreations of the First Defenestration of Prague and of the Second Defenestration of Prague. No. Really. I’m not kidding.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Historical Hullabaloo, Loquacious Language, Volatile Vocabulary